SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 59

LEELA SETH
FARIDABAD SPINNING AND WOLLEN MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
JANTA BUILDERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.Sharma, V.C.Sharma

Leila Seth, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision is directed against the order dated 22nd April, 1985, passed by Ms. Aruna Suresh, Commercial Sub-Judge, Delhi dismissing the application, under Order XVIII Rule 17a, Civil Proceedure Code, read with section 151, Civil Procedure Code, for summoning a clerk from the office of the Registrar of Companies, Calcutta to prove the certificate of incorporation of the plaintiff-company, issued by the Registrar of Companies, Calcutta under section 35 of the Companies Act and/or producing a certified copy of the said certificate.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are that the plaintiff. The Faridabad Spinning and Wollen Mil"ls Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against the defendant on 30th November, 1983, for recovery of Rs. 24 372. 40 p. A photocopy of the certificate of incorporation was filed along with the plaint. On 22nd April, 1985 when the plaintiff was leading its evidence, it sought to prove this certificate. However, the defendant objected to the admissibility of the document since only a photostat copy had been filed. Consequently, the photostat copy was not marked as an exhibit but was marked a for identification.

( 3 ) IT is averred, that it was due to inadv









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top