SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 277

S.B.WAD
MOHAMMAD YUNUS – Appellant
Versus
V. K. NAYYAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sushma Sachdeva, Vishnu Mehra

S. B. Wad

( 1 ) WITH the addition of section 110-CC in the Motor Vehicles Act, the Tribunal and this court have been granting interest to the claimants from the date of the application. The granting of interest is, of course, the matter of discretion of the court considering all facts of the case. The Tribunal in this case has observed in its order that the claimants themselves were responsible for long delay in leading evidence. I, therefore, summoned the original record. I have gone through the original record. The claim petition was filed on 8. 7. 1974. The issues were framed on 27. 8. 1976 and the first date for the petitioner s evidence was 30. 11. 1976. Thereafter, story of the petitioner not taking any interest in the matter and also not summoning the witnesses in time starts. The first witness was examined by him in 1977. His own wife as a witness was examined on 25. 9. 1980 and the petitioner as his own last witness was examined on 7. 11. 1984. This is not a normal case where the claimants being in humble economic strata of the society are deprived of the compensation. Having examined the record I am satisfied that the Tribunal was quite right in not granting any interest.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top