SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 251

MOHINDER NARAIN, N.N.GOSWAMY
M. G. AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN JAITLEY, DINESH AGNANI

Mahinder Narain,j.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition notice to show cause was issuedon 22/01/1987. An affidavit showing cause has been filed, and withthe consent of the parties, the matter is being disposed of by this order.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner is that he was employed as a Juniorengineer in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi w. e. f. 12/03/1984 videannexure P. 3. After joining Municipal Corporation, the petitioner was postedin the City Zone. that is to say an area with respect to old Delhi. The petitionersays that his services were terminated by an order dated 24/07/1986 (annexure P. 1), and an appeal therefrom was disposed of by anon-speakingorder dated 18/11/1986, which is annexure P. 2. The petitioner saysthat the reason for dismissal was that it was alleged against him that in Houseno. 2434, Chhipiwara Kalan, Delhi, which property fell within his jurisdictionas Junior Engineer of the Municipal Corporation, some internal structuralalterations were made between 1970 and 1984. In fact, the petitioner says thatwhile he was new at his job on 31/01/1985, an Inspector of Vigilancewent to the site along with him as complaints had been received regarding unauthorised alterations









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top