SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 106

S.B.WAD
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ANGOORI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.C.JAIN, O.P.GOYAL

S. B. Wad

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal of the New India Assurance Company against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, dated 19. 1. 1980. The accident took place on 16. 6. 1973, in which one Lekh Raj Singh was killed. The fact of the accident is not disputed by the appellant and, indeed, as an insurance company they cannot challenge the award on merits.

( 2 ) IT is submitted that the Tribunal has assumed that the deceased would have lived upto the age of 65 and has calculated the compensation on that basis. It is submitted that while the dependency of the minor claimants has been computed till the ages of 22 and 24 only, the age of 65 years should not have been computed for the purposes of awarding the compensation. I do not find any substance in this argument as it is not legally tenable. The compensation amount is worked out on the basis of the possible longevity of the deceased and the contribution which he would have made towards the family.

( 3 ) THE second submission is that the daughters of the deceased were married by the time the petition was heard and that fact has not been taken into account by the Tribunal. The marriage of the daughters has relevance to the compe







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top