SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 151

B.N.KIRPAL
MOHAMMAD YASIN – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL KALAM – Respondent


B. N. Kirpal

( 1 ) THE petitioner-herein had filed a suit for possession of a portion of a Dallan in premises bearing Municipal No. 857 Katra Hidu Farash Khana, Delhi. In the suit the petitioner had valued the same, for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction, at Rs. 500. 00. Written statement was filed by the respondents in which one of the pleas which was raised was that the value of the property was more than Rs. 25,000. 00.

( 2 ) THE said suit was filed in the year 1978. In 1979 two issues were framed. One of the issues which was framed was "whether the suit has not been valued properly for the purpose or court fee and jurisdiction ? OPD". The other issue which was framed was "whether the defendants have taken illegal possession of the suit premises ? OPP". The third issue was of Relief.

( 3 ) THOUGH the issues were framed in the year 1979, no evidence has so far been recorded in the suit. I am told that a number of dates were fixed for evidence of the parties but for different reasons the case was always adjourned. On 20th December, 1985 the respondents/ defendants moved an application under Order 14 Rule 2 praying that the first issue be treated as a preliminary issue. The t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top