SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 143

N.N.GOSWAMY
PARKASH CHAND AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
N. P. S. CHAWLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.VERMA, ARUN MOHAN, G.A.SHAH, K.C.DEVAN, R.K.MAKHIJA, S.C.Dhanda

Goswamy,j.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal by the landlord is directed againstthe judgment dated 23/11/1978 passed by the Rent Control Tribunalwhereby the eviction order was set aside and the appeal of the tenant wasallowed in part.

( 2 ) IN the original petition for eviction, the eviction was sought onthe ground that the appellant had no suitable accommodation and he had alsoto marry his son for whom there was not enough accommodation in thepremises. During the course of arguments in this appeal, the learned counselfor the appellant has filed an application being CM 836 of 1987 under Order 6rule 5 and Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment ofthe eviction petition. By this application, the appellant wishes to bring onrecord certain additional facts. Some of the facts have arisen subsequent tothe filing of the original petition and some facts now sought to be raised wereexisting even at the time of original petition, However, these grounds andfacts were not raised in the petition. After hearing the learned counsel forthe parties, I am inclined to allow this application to the extent of amendingthe petition under section 14 (l) (e) and not making a new petition underse



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top