N.N.GOSWAMY
PARKASH CHAND AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
N. P. S. CHAWLA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS second appeal by the landlord is directed againstthe judgment dated 23/11/1978 passed by the Rent Control Tribunalwhereby the eviction order was set aside and the appeal of the tenant wasallowed in part.
( 2 ) IN the original petition for eviction, the eviction was sought onthe ground that the appellant had no suitable accommodation and he had alsoto marry his son for whom there was not enough accommodation in thepremises. During the course of arguments in this appeal, the learned counselfor the appellant has filed an application being CM 836 of 1987 under Order 6rule 5 and Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment ofthe eviction petition. By this application, the appellant wishes to bring onrecord certain additional facts. Some of the facts have arisen subsequent tothe filing of the original petition and some facts now sought to be raised wereexisting even at the time of original petition, However, these grounds andfacts were not raised in the petition. After hearing the learned counsel forthe parties, I am inclined to allow this application to the extent of amendingthe petition under section 14 (l) (e) and not making a new petition underse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.