SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 123

MALIK SHARIEF-UD-DIN
RATTAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
amicus curiae, MIRA BHATIA, S.T.SINGH

MALIK SHARIF-UD-DIN, J. (ORAL)

( 1 ) THE appellant was convicted under section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotrpic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter for short known as NDPS ACT) and was sentenced to undergo R. I. for 10 years and also to the fine of Rs. one lakh and in default to further undergo R. 1. for four months. This order Was passed by Shri S. P. Singh Chaudhari Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi on 3rd May, 1986.

( 2 ). I may notice the facts which are that on 15th November, 1985 at about 4. 15 PM Public Witness 7 S. I. Rajinder Singh, who was on duty at Palika Bazar, Connaught Place, accompanied by Public Witness 5 Vijender Singh, Head Constable and Public Witness 6 Sajan Singh Constable is said to have received a secret information in pursuance of which they caught hold of the appellant from the circular park in Connaught Place at the pointing out of the informer. The appellant at that time was found smoking a eigarette allegedly containing heroin and on search four grains of heroin was allegedly recovered from his person. The prosecution case further is that out of the four grams, two grams of heroin was taken as sample and both parts were sealed with the seal of Rajinder.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top