SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 213

S.N.SAPRA, S.S.CHADHA
SWADESHI POLYTAX LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
V. K. GOEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.M.OBEROI, P.P.MALHOTRA

S. S. CHADHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under S. 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, is directed against the order dt. Feb. 2, 1987 passed by G. C. Jain, J. dismissing an appeal under R. 4, Chap. II of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1967, against the order of the Registrar dt. Nov. 14, 1986 directing that certified copies of the proxies be supplied to the plaintiff in the Suit as per the rules.

( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the preliminary objection that the appeal is not maintainable it is necessary to state certain facts. M/s Swadeshi Polytex Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company), defendant No. 2 in the suit/appellant before us, is a public limited company duly incorporated under the Companies Act. Shri V. K. Goel, plaintiff in the suit is a registered shareholder of 50 Equity shares of Rs. 10. 00 each in the Company. The Secretary of the Company issued on 23rd Jan. 1986 a notice for holding of 16th Annual General Meeting of the Company on 15th Mar. 1986 at its registered office. Shri Raghu Raj was appointed as the Chairman of this Annual General Meeting of the Company. Section 176 of the Companies Act gives a right to the members of a company entitled to atte

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top