JAGDISH CHANDRA, R.N.AGGARWAL
RAIPUR ALLOYS AND STIL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a petition by Raipur Alloys and Steel Ltd. (Petitioner No. 1) and V. K. Sharma, a shareholder and executive director, of Petitioner No. 1 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a declaration or any other writ or writs or direction declaring that there was no concluded contract between the parties in respect of the tender No. IS-90 of 1984 and further that the petitioners are not liable to pay any money whatsoever to the respondents in respect of the alleged contract. The petitioners further claimed a declaration that the appointment of the arbitrator and his continuing the arbitration. proceedings is illegal and void and of no legal effect.
( 2 ) THE relevant facts are that the respondents invited tenders for supply of Spring Steel Rounds sometime in September 1984- M/s. Raipur Wires and Steel Ltd. . P-48, Industrial Area, Raipur. M. P. , of which the Petitioner No. I claims to be the successor submitted a tender. The Ministry of Railways (Government of India) by their letter dated 29th November 1984 informed M/s. Raipur Wires and Steels Ltd. that the rates quoted by them against some of the items appear to be high and consequently a counter offer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.