SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 230

C.L.CHAUDHRY
S. K. JAIN – Appellant
Versus
P. SUBBA RAO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C.BHANDARE, Manmohan Krishan, S.N.KUMAR, SVANTANTAR KUMAR

C. L. Chaudbry, J.

( 1 ) THIS is the plaintiff s suit for recovery of Rs. 13,64,080. 00 and for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants restraining them from releasing any of the pictures mentioned in the plaint, produced by them, in violation of the terms of the agreement between the parties. The allegations, as set up in the plaint, are that the plaintiff is carrying on the business of film distribution, exhibition and exploitation of motion pictures in the territory of Delhi and U. P. and they are controlling a number of cinema halls under hire agreements in the territory of Delhi and U. P. and other parts of the country. The plaintiff has even produced pictures and has also financed a number of pictures right from the stage of production. It is stated that defendant No. 1 Shri P. Suba Rao is the sole proprietor of P. S. R. Pictures and is carrying on production of pictures. Defendant No. 2 Shri P. Balaji is the sole proprietor of M/s Balaji Arts and is in the same trade. Defendant No. 2 is the son of defendant No. 1 and, in fact, they are carrying on family business, however, under different banners. Defendant No. 3 is the wife of defendant No. 1 and is basicall








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top