SUNANDA BHANDARE
S. K. GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
HYDERABAD ALLYWN LIMITED – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order of the Senior Sub Judge. Delhi dated 30th June 1987 in R. C. A. No. 37/87.
( 2 ) THE petitioner M/s Rohini Times was appointed as exclusive stockist of the respondent for the Union Territory of Delhi for sale of watches by way of a memorandum of understanding between the respondent and the petitioner dated 1st August 1984. Clause I of the memorandum of understanding reads as follows:
1. This Memorandum of Understanding shall remain in force for a period of "six MONTHS" from the date of its execution. The principal reserves the right to terminate this understanding within this period with or without notice at any time, and without assigning any reason whatsoever. "the case of the petitioner is that this understanding continued till date and the appointment of the petitioner as a stockist was not terminated at any stage, however the respondent committed breach of terms of agency and started marketing their products through various dealers in contravention of the terms of the agency. The petitioner, therefore, on 20th April 1987 filed a suit for permanent injuncti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.