SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 18

G.R.LUTHRA
SADHU RAM – Appellant
Versus
KISHAN KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.K.Sharma, R.P.Suhag

( 1 ) THE present petition under S. 482 Cr. P. C. is directed against an order dt. Oct. 27, 1984 of Shri P. D. Jarwal, Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi directing on the complaint of Krishan Kumar respondent (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) the summoning of the present petitioners in respect to commission of an offence punishable under S. 420 IPC.

( 2 ) ON Mar. 16, 1983, Sunita daughter of the complainant was married to Khem Chand, petitioners 1 and 2 are the parents, petitioners 3 and 5 are the brothers, petitioners 4 and 6 respective wives of the said brothers and petitioners 7 to 9 are the sisters of said Khem Chand. The marriage was unsuccessful one.

( 3 ) THE allegations of the complainant are that he was cheated inasmuch as although Khem Chand was suffering from mental disorder, yet that fact was deliberately concealed from him before the marriage took place. The contention of the complainant is that not only that there was concealment, on the other hand there were all praises and admirations of good health, competence and business acumen of Khem Chand and it was represented that he was earning between Rs. 4000/- to Rs. 5000/- per month on account of good running of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top