CHARANJIT TALWAR
TAIN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE (DELHI ADMN. ) – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts of the prosecution case have been noticed in detail by the trial court. No useful purpose will be served by repeating them. The appellant was not arrested at the spot. After injuring the complainant Dharam Parkash he is alleged to have run away. He was arrested along with some other person on the night intervening 28/29th March, 1984. I may note at the outset that PW5 SI Ram Swaroop who arrested the appellant averred in his examination-in-chief that the arrest was made on the night of 29th March, 1984. However, he clarified during the cross-examination that it was during the night intervening 28/29th March,1984 at about 12. 30 when he effected the arrest
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.