MAHINDER NARAIN
BIDHAN CHANDRA SINHA – Appellant
Versus
SUSHMITA SINHA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE husband who is appellant before me, filed an application under Section 13 (1) (i), (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The. assertion in the petition filed the husband was. therefore, that the wife, after the solemnization of the marriage had voluntary sexual intercourse with a person other than the petitioner; that after the solemnization of the marriage, treated the petitioner with cruelty; and that the husband has been deserted by the respondent for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately after the presentation of the petition.
( 2 ) THE facts as stated in the petition are that the marriage was solemnized between the petitioner and respondent No. 1, Smt. Sushmita Sinha alias Sikha Sinha on 13th June, 1978 at Kashini Bazar. Bolpur, District Birbhum, West Bengal. it is asserted in the petition that after the marriage the parties lived at Bolpur and 15 days after the marriage, the petitioner came Delhi and the respondent stayed back with her father. It was asserted by the petitioner that when his letters to the respondent to come to Delhi did not have any response, he brought the respondent from Bolpur to Delhi. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.