SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 12

MAHINDER NARAIN
BIDHAN CHANDRA SINHA – Appellant
Versus
SUSHMITA SINHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.Sawhney

MAHINDER NARAIN J. (Oral ).

( 1 ) THE husband who is appellant before me, filed an application under Section 13 (1) (i), (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The. assertion in the petition filed the husband was. therefore, that the wife, after the solemnization of the marriage had voluntary sexual intercourse with a person other than the petitioner; that after the solemnization of the marriage, treated the petitioner with cruelty; and that the husband has been deserted by the respondent for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately after the presentation of the petition.

( 2 ) THE facts as stated in the petition are that the marriage was solemnized between the petitioner and respondent No. 1, Smt. Sushmita Sinha alias Sikha Sinha on 13th June, 1978 at Kashini Bazar. Bolpur, District Birbhum, West Bengal. it is asserted in the petition that after the marriage the parties lived at Bolpur and 15 days after the marriage, the petitioner came Delhi and the respondent stayed back with her father. It was asserted by the petitioner that when his letters to the respondent to come to Delhi did not have any response, he brought the respondent from Bolpur to Delhi. Th














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top