SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 84

M.K.CHAWLA
JAI NARAIN N. SADH SHADWARA – Appellant
Versus
PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK SHRIVASTAVA, H.L.TIKKU, J.K.SETH, Rajni Yadav, SAMIR PARKASH

M. K. Chawla

( 1 ) BY this order I propose to dispose of Defendant No. 3 s application, I. A. 4060/85 in Suit No. 1693/83 and I. A. 4059/85 in Suit No. 1694/83. However, the facts of Suit No. 1693/83 are being taken into consideration for the purpose of disposing of these applications.

( 2 ) IN a suit for recovery of Rs. 10,30,49007, the case set up by the plaintiff, M/s. Jai Narain N. Sadh. Sadhwara, in brief, is that the Plaintiff firm airfreighted the four consignments of cotton printed cloth articles through Pan American World Airways, Defendant No. 1 of the total value of Rs. 2,91,700. 00 from Delhi for being safely carried to and to be delivered in sound condition at the destination airport, Armsterdam of Holland, to the consignee. Defendant No. 3, Armsterdam-Rotterdam Bank N. V. (hereinafter called "amre Bank") or to the proposed customer after due authorisation for the same by the consignee or consignor, the Plaintiff firm. Defendant No. 2, Ambar Tours Private Limited acted as an authorised agent of Defendant No. 1 and completed all the usual fromalities of issuing airway bills etc; to the plaintiff firm. Later on Defendant No. 1 informed the Plaintiff firm that the aforesai














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top