MAHINDER NARAIN
SUSHIL KUMAR VERMA – Appellant
Versus
USHA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a husband s appeal against the order of Shri G. S. Dhaka, Additional District Judge. Delhi, dated 30th August, 1983, whereby the husband s petition for a decree of divorce under S. 13 (l) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ), was refused.
( 2 ) THE parties were married according to the Hindu rites on 23-11-1980 at Delhi. The wife is stated to have left the appellant on l5th Feb. 1981.
( 3 ) THERE were various grounds taken by the husband in the petition for dissolution of marriage but in this appeal 1 need to mentioned only the grounds mentioned in paras 4a, 4b and 4c of the amended petition, which read as under : -
"4a. That at the time of departure of the respondent from the matrimonial home on 15-1-81 the petitioner was not aware that the respondent was carrying a child from the joins of the petitioner 4b. That the respondent obtained some I medicines from Doctor Kirpal Singh Bakshi. Delhi on 15-1-81 and also obtained a prescription and the said medicine was meant for terminating of pregnancy and further that at the time of obtaining the medicine she had given a false address of her residence. 4c. That the respo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.