( 1 ) THE controversy in this revision petition lies in a very narrow compass, the sole question which falls for determination being whether the civil courts have jurisdiction to try the suit instituted by the plaintiff-petitioner against the defendants-respondents with respect to a plot of land bearing No. 46 (old)/10 (new) Manohar Park situated in the revenue estate of Basai Darapur.

( 2 ) THE facts germane to the decision of this petition in brief are that way back in 1966 the petitioner instituted a suit for possession of a plot of land measuring 200 sq. yards and bearing No. 46 (old)/10 (new) on the ground that he bad purchased the same from Raghbir Singb, respondent No. 2 vide registered sale deed dated 25th March 1960 and be was put into possession thereof by the vendor. However, sometime in 1965 be learnt that respondents, l, 3 and 4 respondent 3 and 4 being daughters of respondent No. I had illegally occupied the same and bad built a boundry wall and some rooms thereon. The suit was contested by respondents 1, 3 and 4 who asserted that Smt. Usha, respondent No. 4, had purchased a plot of land bearing No. 48 (old) corresponding to new No. 10 situated in the