SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 194

MALIK SHARIEF-UD-DIN, R.N.AGGARWAL
ROBERT LENDI – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.L.MEHTA, SATISH AGGARWAL

Malik Sharief-nd-din, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has moved this application under Sec. 439 Cr. P C- 1973 for grant of bail. It came up For hearing before the learned single Judge of this court. During the course of arguments the learned Single Judge felt that the question which arises for determination in the petition is important in the sense that it is likely to arise in many cases. The learned Single Judge ordered that the matter be referred to a larger bench. This is how the petition has come up before us.

( 2 ) THE facts are that the petitioner Robert Lendi is facing trial under Sections 132 and 135 (a) of the Customs Act, 1963 and Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act. 1947. The petitioner had moved an application for bail on 6. 2 1986 under Section 437 sub-section (6) Cr. P. C. which was declined by the learned Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate by his order dated 15. 2. 1986 The petitioner thereafter moved an application for grant of bail before the Sessions Court by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge also refused to admit the petitioner to bail. What followed thereafter is the present bail application,

( 3 ) AT this stage we may notice the grounds which weighed with



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top