SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 193

M.K.CHAWLA
NIRANJAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.SHARMA

M. K. Chawla, J.

( 1 ) BY order dated 1. 6. 85 the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the accused as under : (i) Under Section 363 Indian Penal Code I sentence the accused with R I. for 3 years alongwith a fine of Rs. 100. 00. In default of the payment of - fine he will suffer further R. I. for one month. (ii) Under Section 366 I. P. C. I sentence the accused with R. I. for 7 years alongwith a fine of Rs. 100. 00. In default of payment of fine he will further suffer R. l. for one month. (iii) Under Section 376 Indian Penal Code I sentence the accused with R. I. for 7 years alongwith a fine of Rs. 100. 00. In default of payment of fine he will further suffer R. I. for one month. All the substantive sentences of imprisonment were ordered to run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE appellant has challenged his conviction and sentence by way of filing the present appeal.

( 3 ) UNFORTUNATELY, learned counsel for the appellant has not cared to put in appearance inspite of the fact that the case remained on the board since 28-4-86 as item No. 1. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the State and with his help gone through the record carefully.

( 4 ) THE only gri




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top