SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 247

S.B.WAD
RENU JAIN – Appellant
Versus
MAHAVIR PRASHAD JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L.RAVAL, GITA MITTAL, S.P.JAIN, SVANTANTAR KUMAR

S. B. WAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed against the order of the Additional District Judge, dt. 15-1-1985, in HMA 455/81. In the divorce petition filed by the respondent Mahavir Prasad Jain, petitioner Smt. Renu Jain has filed an application under S. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. She had claimed Rs. 3000. 00 towards pendente lite maintenance and Rs. 5. 000. 00 as litigation expenses. She had claimed an additional sum of Rs. 1,000. 00 during pregnancy and Rs. 500. 00 for meeting the delivery expenses. The application was filed in March 1982 and after prolonged evidence and hearing the order was passed almost three years later. By that time the child was already two years old. The learned trial Judge had awarded pendente lite maintenance at Rs. 750. 00 per month w. e. f. 11-3-1982 and directed that the arrears of maintenance should be paid in four equal instalments. He also awarded a sum of Rs. 2,000. 00 towards litigation expenses. The wife Renu Jain filed this civil revision complaining that the amount of Rs. 750. 00 as pendente lite maintenance was too inadequate for herself and the child. She has claimed that the income of the husband from the various businesses and p













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top