SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 303

JAGDISH CHANDRA
SURINDER KUMAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
SUVIDYA YADAV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.SHARMA, MADAN LOKUR, S.R.Singh

JAGDISH CHANDRA

( 1 ) THIS petition is directed against the order dated 6th December, 1985 passed by Shri P. K. Tain, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Criminal Revision No. 35 of 1984 which had in turn set aside the order dated 3rd February, 1984 passed by Shri R. S. Mahla, Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi, whereby the accused-petitioners had been discharged in case FIR No. 437182 of Police Station Karol Bagh, New Delhi, in respect of oflences u/ss 448/442/323/120-B/34 Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) THE F. I. R. was lodged by respondent No. 1 Smt. Suvidya Yadav and according to the Smt. she along with her husband and children had been residing in Flat No. J-16, MIG, DDA Flats, Prasad Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, which had been taken by them from petitioner No. 2 Suresh Yadav in March 1980. She further alleged that they had paid a sum of Rs. 61,000 in foreign exchange and another sum of Rs. 36,000 to Suresh Yadav on account of the price in respect of this flat but on account of relationship no deed was executed and as the market price of this flat increased Suresh Yadav threatened them to vacate the same. It is further alleged that on 7th April. 1984 at about 11. 15 A. M. petitioners 1. 3 an











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top