SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 315

MAHESH CHANDRA
APOLLO TYRES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAKESH SAWHNEY, Y.K.SABHARVAL

MAHESH CHANDRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS order would dispose of application filed under -Section 34 of the Arbitration Act by defendant No. 2.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this application are that the plaintiff had filed asuit for recovery of Rs. 9,51,9051- against National Insurance Company Limited-defendant No. 1, Ms. Chadha Motor Transport Co. (P) Ltd. , defendant No. 2, M s. Kohli Auto Corporation-defendant No. 3 and Shri Narinder Singh of M/s. Kohli Auto Corporation-defendant No. 4 on the allegation that the plaintiff bad obtained from defendant No. 1 an open policy of Marine (Inland Transit) Insurance bearing. No. 750/4400363/82/9/0/sdp? dated 4th November, 1982 to cover "all consignments of tyres, tubes and flaps securely packed during transit by rail/road/conveyance"; that the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 had agreed vide agreement operative from 15th October 1980 that defendant No. 2 would securely carry for the plaintiff plaintiff s products from Jullundur station to different stations in the Punjab for delivery on the customers producing lorry receipts after discharging them from the bank concerned; that on different dates between 3rd January 1983 and 17th March 1983 the plainti





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top