SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 331

JAGDISH CHANDRA
PYARE LAL – Appellant
Versus
SITA RAM MAMGOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.U.KHAN, S.K.AGRAWAL

Jagdish Chandra, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER No. I Pyare Lal is the father of petitioner No. 2 Jagdish Kumar Ghai and both of them have filed this revision petition under Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the Code ) against the judgment dated 23rd September, 1985 passed by Shri Mahesh Chandra, then Addl. Sessions Judge, New Delhi, who had accepted the revision petition of respondent No. I and set aside the order of summoning dated 3rd June, 1985 passed by Shri O. P. Gupta, Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, on the complaint of the petitioners.

( 2 ) THE petitioners had filed a complaint against respondent Sita Ram Mamgoi, then S. H. O. of Police Station Lodhi Colony. New Delhi, and the Police Commissioner and the State under Sections 326/307/506/354/ 355/356/357 Indian Penal Code alleging that on 25th July, 1984 at about 5-30 P. M. tw police officers and a constable came to their residence and pressed them to go to the police station Lodhi Road and that respondent Sita Ram Mamgoi, S. H. O. had sent them to arrest them. The complainants were not aware of any offence against them. When they reached the aforcsaid police station, S. H. O. Sita Ram Mamgoi arri






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top