SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 334

S.S.CHADHA
UMESH KUMAR AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
SHASHI KUMARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL CHAWLA, MUKUL ROHTAGI

( 1 ) THE first appeal under S. 28, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is directed against the judgment and decree dated April 2, 1985 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, dismissing husband s petition under S. l3 (l) (ia) and (ib) of the said Act.

( 2 ) THE parties were married according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on January 31, 1977 at Dehradun. After solemnization of the marriage, the parties resided at D 16/409, Lodhi Road, New Delhi and cohabited as husband and wife. No child was born from this lawful wedlock. The appellant had earlier filed a petition on September 6, 1980 under S. 13 (ia) and (ib), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short called the Act ) on the allegations that the respondent left the matrimonial home on or about September 1, 1977 and did not join the appellant thus deserting him without reasonable cause and that the respondent has treated the appellant with cruelty. That petition was contested by the respondent. It was dismissed on both grounds by Shri K. S. Gupta, Additional District Judge, Delhi vide judgment and decree dated May 6, 1981. A second petition under S. 13 (ia) and (ib) of the Act, out of which the present appeal has arisen, was filed











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top