SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Del) 384

SULTAN SINGH
S. L. SEHGAL – Appellant
Versus
OM PARKASH MITTAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.KAPUR, Rajinder Mathur, V.B.ANDLEY

Sultan Singh, J.

( 1 ) ON 27/7/1977 the appellant and the respondent made an application under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short the Act ) before the Rent Controller, Delhi for permission to let out the ground floor of House No. E-239, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi to the appellant for a period of three years. On 28/7/1977statements of the appellant and the respondent were recorded and the Additional Controller granted permission to the respondent to let out the said premises to the appellant for residential purposes for a period of three years with effect from 28/7/1977.

( 2 ) ON 20/1/1981 the respondent filed an application for obtaining possession of the said premises. On 27/3/1981 the appellant filed objections. He has alleged that the respondent was not entitled to possession of the suit premises : his son P. K. Sehgal was tenant in the premises on a monthly rent of Rs. 500. 00 from 1/8/1974 to 13/11/1976 when he was transferred to "nasik and from 14/11/1976 the appellant was accepted as a tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 700. 00 by the respondent ; the appellant had paid rent for the period 14/11/1976 onwards Rs. 700. 00per month and he has been in possessi






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top