SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 103

CHARANJIT TALWAR
GANGA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.MATHUR, D.R.Sethi, I.U.KHAN

Charanjit Talwar, J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment disposes of two revision peti- lions, namely, Cr. R. Nos. 216 and 224 of 1983, which were directed by Anandj. to be heard together.

( 2 ) BY Criminal Revision No. 216 of 1983 Ganga Devi, her son 0m Parkash and her grand son Bhupinder Kumar have sought quashing of the charge framed against them under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 6th August, 1983. The charge reads us under :--

"i, Shri B. B. Gupta, A. S. J : New Delhi charge you Om Parkash son of Hari Ram, (2) Bhupinder Kumar son of Om Parkash and Smt. Ganga Devi w/o Hari Ram as under : That on 8. 6. 1982 at house No. B-5/75, Safdarjang Enclave, New Delhi, in the area of P. S. Vinay Nagar, Smt. Usha Rani committed suicide. And you all in furtherance of your common intention abetted the commission of that suicide by torture and instigation, and thereby you committed the offence punishable under Section 306 read with 34 Indian Penal Code and within the jurisdiction of this Court. sd/- A. S. J. New Delhi. ". The reasons for framing the above charge are contained in a separate order dated 4th August, 1983. it has been noticed












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top