SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 101

D.P.WADHWA
R. P. SACHDEVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANU GOSVAMY, P.C.Khanna, Reva Khetrapal

D. P. WADHWA

( 1 ) THIS petition though registered as a probate case is in fact tor grant of a succession certificate in respect of the movables of late Shri R. P. Sachdeva. It has been filed under Ss. 370/372 of the Succession Act, 1925 (for short the Act ) falling under Part X of the Act. Such a petition for grant of succession certificate can be filed in the Court of the District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided, as is provided under S. 371 of the Act. "district Judge" under S. 2 (bb) of the Act means the Judge of a principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction.

( 2 ) THE question that I have to consider is as to whether the present petition is maintainable in the Delhi High Court. It is not disputed that a petition for grant of succession certificate is not a suit. It is also not disputed that the property in respect of which succession certificate is being claimed values over Rs. 1 lac.

( 3 ) WITH reference to S. 5 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, it was submitted by Mr. P. C. Khanna, Advocate, that the Delhi High Court is a principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction and would be included in the definition of the "district Judge". I do not











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top