SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 108

M.K.CHAWLA
ELOFIC INDUSTRIES INDIA – Appellant
Versus
STEEL BIRD INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUP SINGH, K.L.Singh, M.M.SINGH

M. K. chawala,j

( 1 ) UNDER the provisions of Section 111 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 the Court has the power and the duty. to Stay the plaintiff s suit where the Validity of the registration of the trade mark is questioned by the defendants. Relevant Section 111 reads as under : Section III (1) Where in any suit for the infringement of a trade mark,

(A) the defendant pleads that the registration of the plaintiff s trade mark is invalid; or

(B) the defendant raises a defence under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 30 and the plaintiff pleads the invalidity of the registration of the defendants trade mark; the Court trying the suit (hereinafter referred to as the court), shall.

IF any proceedings for rectification of the register in relation to the plaintiff s or defendant s trade mark are pending before the registrar or the High court stay the suit pending the final disposal of such proceedings;

IF no such proceedings are pending and the Court is satisfied that the plea regarding the in- tendant s trade mark is prima facie tenable, raise an issue regarding the same and adjourn the case for a period of there months from the date of the framing of the issue in o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top