M.K.CHAWLA
ELOFIC INDUSTRIES INDIA – Appellant
Versus
STEEL BIRD INDUSTRIES – Respondent
( 1 ) UNDER the provisions of Section 111 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 the Court has the power and the duty. to Stay the plaintiff s suit where the Validity of the registration of the trade mark is questioned by the defendants. Relevant Section 111 reads as under : Section III (1) Where in any suit for the infringement of a trade mark,
(A) the defendant pleads that the registration of the plaintiff s trade mark is invalid; or
(B) the defendant raises a defence under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 30 and the plaintiff pleads the invalidity of the registration of the defendants trade mark; the Court trying the suit (hereinafter referred to as the court), shall.
IF any proceedings for rectification of the register in relation to the plaintiff s or defendant s trade mark are pending before the registrar or the High court stay the suit pending the final disposal of such proceedings;
IF no such proceedings are pending and the Court is satisfied that the plea regarding the in- tendant s trade mark is prima facie tenable, raise an issue regarding the same and adjourn the case for a period of there months from the date of the framing of the issue in o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.