SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 154

OM PARKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


J. D. Jain, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against order dated 7th June 1984 of an Additional Sessions Judge declining permission to the Public Prosecutor to withdraw from the prosecution of the petitioners.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the present petition in brief are that S/shri Surinder Singh, Raghbir Singh, Balbir Singh and Mohinder Singh, who are real brothers, are running a guest house called "dashmesh Guest House" at Chowk Sang Tarashan, Delhi. Hari Parshad-petitioner No. 4, his sons 0m Parkash-Pelitioiier No. 1 and Satish Klimar-petitioner No. 3 have a shop near by the said Guest House where they sell milk, curd and fruit juices etc. On 19th June 1980, Surinder Singh lodged a report (FIR No. 877/80 under Section 307/324/34 IPC) against all the four petitioners with Paharganj police to the effect that seven or eight days prior to that date Hari Parshad etc -. were having a Jagran (i. e. recitation of devotional songs etc. night to propitiate the Goddess) at Chowk Sang Tarasban and they were singing Bhajans (religious songs), However, the mike of the loud speaker was fitted in the direction of their Guest House and the music was being played at a very loud pit












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top