SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 175

GIAN CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.U.KHAN, R.P.Lao

Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J.

( 1 ) TO begin with, four persons, namely, Gian Chand appellant, one Jai Chand, Rakesh Kumar and Nairn Ahmed were prosecuted under sections 302/34 and 120-B Indian Penal Code and sections 27/54/59 of Indian Arms Act for conspiring and committing death of one Radhey Sham alias Lala on the night of 6th September 1980 at about 9. 45 P. M. near Meera Pai Mandir in the area of Govindpuri, Delhi. The deceased Radhey a has Lala as also another Radhey Sham Public Witness 10 were carrying on embroidery business. Deceased Radhey belonged to Chandni Chowk, Delhi. These two persons were known to each other intimately. Sant Lal Public Witness 15 was a property broker in Govindpuri area and was also known to the deceased and Public Witness 10 Radhey Sham. The four accused persons who were put on trial were allegedly working in an embroidery factory. Three of them, namely, Gian Chand, his brother Jai Chand and Naim Ahmed were employees of Kishan Chand Public Witness 2.

( 2 ) ON 6th September 190, Radbey deceased had gone to Govindpuri for repair of his embroidery machine. There he came across Public Witness 10 Radhey Sham. After he got his machine repaired and despatched



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top