SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 192

D.R.KHANNA
BINDRA BUILDERS – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Vohra, M.S.Vohra, RAMESH CHANDRA

D. R. KHANNA, J.

( 1 ) THIS will dispose of two petitions moved under Ss. 20 and 33 of the Arbitration Act by M/s. Bindra Builders. The respondent is the Delhi Development Authority. By the former the petitioner is seeking reference of disputes numbering 14 as mentioned in Annexure a attached with the petition to arbitration. The other is for determining the effect and validity of the arbitration agreement with regard to claim No. 5 of that Annexure. That claim is to the following effect:

"dispute over sanction of substituted item for Makrana white marble provided in the works; Rs. 3. 75 lacs. "

( 2 ) THE background is that the petitioner executed a contract for the construction of 201 houses on behalf of the respondent at Siri Fort, New Delhi for the "asiad". The total amount thereof was about 2. 2 crores. Specifications and rates of different items were also agreed upon. One of the terms of the contract was that the petitioner would use makrana superior marble . The rate according to the petitioner for this was around Rs. 781. 00 per sq. meter. However, during the course of the execution of the contract the petitioner found that the makrana marble was not available and it appe


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top