SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 238

YOGESHWAR DAYAL
PAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
MULAKH RAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.D.GUPTA, S.S.Joshi

Yogeshwar Dayal, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENT, Mulakh Raj, had filed a suit for the recovery of Rs. 10. 172. 00 under the provisions of Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This suit was filed on or about 1st June, 1977. It came up before the court on 3rd June, 1977 when the court directed that the suit be registered and summons under Order 37 be issued to the defendant/petitioners for 9th August, 1977. The defendants were served with the summons under the provisions of Order 37 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 12th October, 1977. On 19th October, 1977 the defendants caused the vakalatnama to be filed on their behalf through Sh. P. D. Gupta, Advocate.

( 2 ) THE suit came up before the court on 19th October, 1977 and it appears that the counsel for the defendants had filed a power-of-attorney executed in his favour by the respondents on that date. The order sheet of 19th October, 1977 is not very legible and it cannot be said whether counsel for the defendants was present when the suit was taken up by the court on that date.

( 3 ) HOWEVER, the suit was adjourned to 24th October, 1977. On 24th October, 1977 both the counsel for the parties were present and it was noticed in the or












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top