SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 275

N.N.GOSWAMY, PRAKASH NARAIN
N. S. JAIN – Appellant
Versus
SUPDL, CENTRAL JAIL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARJUN BHANDARI, M.K.GUPTA, M.MUDGAL, R.M.Bagai

Prakash Narain, C. J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner. Dr. N. S. Jain, approaches this Court for the second time in connection with and in regard to his submission that he be ordered to be prematurely released from jail where he is undergoing sentence of life imprisonment on conviction by the Sessions Jud. ge under Sections 302/120-B/34, Indian Penal Code, which sentence was upheld by the High Court and, in a way, confirmed by the Supreme Court when it dismissed the special leave petition of the petitioner against the judgment of the High Court. The petitioner, including the period of detention as an under trial while being prosecuted for the above offences, has by now been confined for almost 16 years.

( 2 ) ORIGINALLY the petitioner had approached this Court with a complaint that his case was not being considered for premature release as postulated by Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with para 516-B of the relevant jail manual. In that casc this Court had directed that Delhi Administration to expeditiously consider the petitioner s case. In consequence of that direction, the Sentence Revising Board of the Delhi Administration met on 3rd June, 1985 and opined that it did no

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top