SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 313

J.D.JAIN
TEJENDER TEWARIARI – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH LATA KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S.Mann, R.K.MAKHIJA, S.PAPPU, V.K.Makhija

( 1 ) THE facts giving rise to the above mnetioned appeals which are closely inter-connected and are directed against order dated 23rd April, 1983 of the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi, succinctly are that wayback on 23rd February, 1976, the respondent-Smt. Subhash Lata Kumar moved two separate applications purporting to be under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ,) for permission to create two separate tenancies in favour of Shri Tejinder Tewari and Major R. C. Chhiba, the present appellants. In miscellaneous application No. 98/76, it was staled that the respondent-Maj. R. C. Chhiba had agreed to take on rent the ground floor of the rear portion of the property bearing No. N-57, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi, comprising drawing-cum-dining room with one bath room and a bed room besides other amenities on a monthly rent of Rs. 850. 00 with effect from 25th February, 1976 for a period of two years for use as residence only on the terms and conditions set out in the draft lease-deed annexed thereto. She further stated that she was not in need of the said premises as landlady for a period of two years. Her statement was recorded by the Additional







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top