SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 388

SULTAN SINGH
BHAGWANT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Vohra, KAILASH VASUDEV, M.S.Vohra, SUDHIR KUMAR

Sultan Singh, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision has been filed by Bhagwant Singh and Harbel Singh, defendant Nos. 2 and 3, while another revision (Civil Revision No. 457 of 1985) has been filed by Krishan Lal, defendant No. 1. Both the revisions challenge the judgment and order dated 1st December, 1984 of the lower appellate court confirming the order of the trial court dated 14th November, 1983 restraining the defendants from forcibly and wrongfully dispossessing the plaintiff from almirah like shop and also from demolishing the front wall in which the said almirah is embedded till the disposal of the suit.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY these are the facts ; Mohan Lal, plaintiff/respondent No. I, on 6th April, 1983 filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dispossing him from the almirah shop and from demolishing the wall on which the me is fixed. The plaintiff has alleged that he is a tenant in a shop forming part of 89, Ghaffar Market, New Delhi, delineated in the site plan annexed with the plaint for the last over 25 years on a monthly rent of Rs. 100. 00. He has alleged that the property was allotted to Sajjan Singh and Mehboob Singh ; that he was inducted as tenant at Rs. 10






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top