SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 469

High Court Of Delhi
COURT IN ITS OWN MOTION - Appellant
Versus
YOGESH SHARMA - Respondent
Civil 230 of 1985
Decided On : 12/13/1985

Advocates Appeared:
R.K.SAINI, Sodhi Teja Singh

The court's inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be used to quash pending prosecutions that are unjustified, oppressive, or a waste of judicial resources.

Headnote:

ATTEMPT TO COMMIT SUICIDE - SECTION 309 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE - QUASHING OF PENDING PROSECUTIONS - INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

Fact of the Case:

The court took suo moto cognizance of the large number of cases pending in trial courts in Delhi under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which criminalizes attempt to commit suicide. The court noted that many of these cases had been pending for years, causing unnecessary hardship and trauma to the accused.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution of individuals under Section 309 IPC was often mechanical and mindless, with little regard for the individual circumstances of the accused or the merits of the case. The court also noted that the continuation of such prosecutions was a waste of judicial resources and brought the image of the courts into disrepute.

Issues: 1. Whether the court has the inherent power to quash pending prosecutions under Section 309 IPC. 2. Whether the prosecution of individuals under Section 309 IPC is justified in light of the social and psychological factors that may lead to suicide attempts.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that it has the inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash pending prosecutions in order to secure the ends of justice. 2. The court found that the prosecution of individuals under Section 309 IPC is often unjustified and counterproductive, as it further traumatizes the accused and diverts valuable judicial resources from more serious crimes.

Final Decision: The court quashed all pending prosecutions under Section 309 IPC in the trial courts of Delhi and directed the immediate acquittal of the accused in those cases.

Rajindar Sachar

( 1 ) I had in exercise of my powers u/s 482, C. P. C. directed that the various files of cases pending u/s IPC. 309 (attempt to commit suicide) in the trial Courts in Delhi, be summoned and placed before me for disposal. The files have been called by the Registry and placed before me. From the statement, I find that there are 120 cases pending in various trial Courts in Delhi, some pending since 1972.

( 2 ) MR. Saini, Advocate, is present in Court. I have asked him to assist me in these matters. He appears amicus curiae. Notice had been issued to the State. Sodhi Teja Singh, Standing Counsel for the State, also appears for Delhi Administration.

( 3 ) A. D. B. of this Court in State v. Sanjay Kumar, 1985 Cri. L. J. 931, in dealing with a case u/s 309, Indian Penal Code. observed that the "continuance of Sec. 309 Indian Penal Code. is an anachronism unworthy of a humane society like ours. " It also observed that there was no justification for a provision like Sec. 309 Indian Penal Code to be on the statute book. It seems paradoxical that a person who, if the prosecution is to be believed, is so unhappy that he makes an attempt to commit a suicide, should, if he fails in his attempt, instead of being attended to by the medical doctors and psychiatrists, be arrested and roughed through by the police and face criminal courts for all these years which will coarsen him further. The Bench in that case found that the law u/s 167, Criminal Procedure Code. had been wrongly applied, but did not send the case for retrial because it felt that there was no justification to subject the accused to any further misery at the hands of the Courts and, therefore, upheld the acquittal of the accused. That judgment was given on 29. 3. 85. It is true that Sec. 309, Indian Penal Code. still continues on the statute book and technically speakinp, the offence continues to be there and if the police send up a charge sheet u/s 308 IPC, the Courts cannot per se hold that a case has been sent up for an offence which is not a part of the statute. But 1 see no reason why the delay in repealing this provision which no longer finds place in almost all the civilised nations of the world should be applied so as to continue to add the backlogs to the already over worked courts. As it is there is enough of criminality in the society which keep the police, the prosecution and the courts busy for all the time and there is no reason to put more stress on these institutions than is absolutely necessary. I can only hope that this provision is removed from the statute book at the earliest. Personally speaking, I see no justification for the police to send up a case u/s 309 IPC. I would, in the circumstances, be inclined, as I do here intend, to quash all such cases pending in the lower courts u/s 309 IPC, without reference to any individual facts of each case. The reason is that there is a broad common pattern in all these prosecutions, namely, an unhappy person has tried to take his own life, even if the prosecution case is accepted in toto. I consider it perverse that such an unhappy person should be further dragged in courts and that his trauma should be lengthened. I am, however, mentioning facts of a few cases to show as to how there is not even a semblance of a justification for prosecution u/s 309 Indian Penal Code and yet the proceedings are dragging on for years just because neither the police nor, unfortunately, the trial courts seem to look at this matter with a humane eye.

( 4 ) ONE of the usual ways in which prosecution are launched u/s. 309 Indian Penal Code is that whenever a person and almost invariably a person belonging to the poorer section of the society or a woman is admitted in a hospital in a critical condition and it is suspected that he has taken some article, it is assumed that such a person has deliberately taken poison to commit suick e. The constable attached to the hospital would send up a report to the police station indicati









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top