SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Del) 31

G.C.JAIN, AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
JOGINDER SINGH BEDI – Appellant
Versus
SARDAR SINGH NARANG – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Paul, C.L.ITORORA, C.S.DUGGAL, G.S.Vohra, S.L.Bhatia, Virender Mehta

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI, J

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of a suit for specific performance. The suit was decreed in favour of the purchaser by a learned single judge of this court on 4-12-1981. From that decree the vendor appeals to this court. A transferee of the property has also filed cross-objections.

( 2 ) THE appellant Joginder Singh Bedi was the owner of House No. A-67 South Extension Part I, New Delhi. He is the vendor. On 29-4-1972 he agreed to sell the house to Narotam Singh, respondent No. 2, a Thailand based Indian for a sum of Rs. 1,35,000. He is the purchaser. At the time of the execution of the agreement to sell a sum of Rs. 20,000 was paid by the purchaser to the vendor. In furtherance of the agreement to sell the vendor executed a sale deed in favour of the purchaser on 3-5-1972 engrossed on a stamp paper of the value of Rs. 10,800. The purchaser asked the vendor to obtain an income tax clearance certificate and to get the sale deed registered. The purchaser was prepared to pay the balance of the purchase price, that is, Rs. 1,15,000 at the time of the registration of the sale deed. The vendor did not do his part. He took no steps to obtain the income. tax clearance ce







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top