JAGDISH CHANDRA
NAVIN VARSHNEYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition assails the order dated 3-2-1983 passed by Shri T. S. Oberoi, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi on a revision having been preferred by the petitioners Naveen Varshneya and Smt. Nirmal Varshneya against the order dated 22-5-1982 passed by Mrs. Aruna Suresh, Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi whereby the learned magistrate had summoned both the petitioners in the complaint filed under Sections 420, 120-B and also under Section 34 Indian Penal Code and which order was held valid by Shri T. S. Oberoi in revision.
( 2 ) PETITIONER No. 1 Naveen Varshneya and petitioner No. 2 Mrs. Nirmal Varshneya are husband and wife and whereas the former is sole proprietor of M/s Kumar Enterprises the latter is the sole proprietor of M/s Kumar Traders. Both these concerns of the petitioners have been having business dealings with M/s Radha Krishan Bimal Kumar (P.) Ltd, Khari Baoli Delhi in which the complainant Suresh Chand Sharma is the Sales Executive. Petitioner No. 1 Naveen Varshneya alone had been in contact with M/s Radha Krishan Bimal Kumar (P) Ltd. for making purchases of orient black, phil black and zinc oxide etc. and it was the name of M/s Kumar Enterprises as well a
REFERRED TO : Hari Prasad Chamaria v. Bishun Kumar Surekha and others
Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal v. Birendra Chandra Chakravarty
Trilok Singh and others v. Statya Deo Tripathi
The State of Kerala v. A Prasad Pillai and AM.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.