SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Del) 165

YOGESHWAR DAYAL
PRITAM SINGH DHINGRA – Appellant
Versus
AMBADIPUDI UMA SAMBAMURTHY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.NASIMHAN, M.VADHVANI

Yogeshwar Dayal, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against an order of learned Commercial Sub-Judge, Delhi, dated 22nd February, 1983, whereby the learned Commercial Sub-Judge, accepted an application filed by the plaintiff Under the provisions of Order 37 Rule 2 Sub-rule (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff/respondent had filed a suit under the provisions of Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure for recovery of Rs. 20. 900. 00 against the petitioner.

( 3 ) THE case of the plaintiff/respondent in the plaint was that the defendant entered into an agreement dated 23rd May, 1981 with the plaintiff to sell a piece of land situated in Gurgaon measuring about 160 sq. yards. It was pleaded that the defendant represented himself to be the owner of the said property and agree to sell the land for a total consideration of Rs. l,25,000. 00 At the time of execution of the said agreement on May 23, 1981, the defendant received from the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 10. 000. 00 as part payment of the total consideration and receipt thereof was also executed. As per the terms and conditions of the agreement, the defendant agreed and was obliged to produce to the plaintiff






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top