High Court Of Delhi
ASHA HANDA - Appellant
Versus
BALDEV RAJ HANDA - Respondent
First Appeal Order 316 of 1982
Decided On : 09/06/1984
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT - SECTION 13(1)(IA), 13(1)(IB) - DIVORCE - CRUELTY - DESERTION - INTERPRETATION OF LEGAL PROVISIONS - ANALYSIS OF COURT'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant-wife filed a petition for divorce against the respondent-husband on the grounds of cruelty and desertion under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The appellant alleged that the respondent forced her to hand over her entire salary to him, was harsh and abusive towards her, and even beat her on occasions. She also alleged that the respondent left the house early in the morning and came back late at night in a drunken state, and that he did not take her for outings or social functions. The respondent denied the allegations and claimed that the appellant was cruel to him and that she had agreed to the separation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent was guilty of cruelty and desertion. It held that the respondent's conduct towards the appellant amounted to cruelty, as it was grave and weighty and made cohabitation virtually unendurable. The court also found that the respondent was guilty of constructive desertion, as his conduct forced the appellant to leave the matrimonial home.
Issues: 1. Whether the respondent's conduct amounted to cruelty? 2. Whether the respondent was guilty of desertion?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the respondent's conduct towards the appellant amounted to cruelty, as it was grave and weighty and made cohabitation virtually unendurable. The court relied on the fact that the respondent forced the appellant to hand over her entire salary to him, was harsh and abusive towards her, and even beat her on occasions. 2. The court held that the respondent was guilty of constructive desertion, as his conduct forced the appellant to leave the matrimonial home. The court relied on the fact that the respondent left the house early in the morning and came back late at night in a drunken state, and that he did not take the appellant for outings or social functions.
Final Decision: The court granted the appellant a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 30th August 1982 of an Additional District Judge whereby he dismissed the petition of the appellant-wife for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion falling under sub-cl. (ia) and (ib) of S. 13 (1), Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).
( 2 ) THE undisputed facts of the case are that the marriage between the parties was solemnised on 21st March 1972 at West Patel Nagar, New Delhi, in accordance with the Hindu rites and ceremonies. Thereafter, they lived together as husband and wife up to 7th August 1977 when they parted company of each other. A daughter by the name of Nancy Handa was born out of the wedlock on 28th July 1974. The wife is presently employed as a clerk in the customs Department and is drawing about Rs. 900. 00 per mensem. The respondent is employed in Punjab National Bank and is drawing more than a thousand rupees per mensem The respondent was employed in Punjab National Bank even at the time of marriage with the appellant, but it would appear that she got employment in 1973 i. e. soon after the marriage.
( 3 ) ON 5th March 1981. the appellant moved a petition for divorce against respondent on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. She averred that from the beginning of 1973 the respondent started forcing her to hand over her entire salary to him. As an obedient wife she complied with his wishes as she had no other option and she did not want to embitter her relations with respondent It was with great difficulty that he would give her a petty amount for her day-to-day expenses. With the passage of time, the attitude of the respondent became more and more harsh towards her and he would grudge giving her any money even for her personal expenses. At the time of the birth of their daughter she was admitted to Kapoor Hospital, Pusa Road, for delivery, but even then the respondent did not bear the expenses of her labour and medicines, etc. He managed to get even the salary for three months to which the appellant was entitled during her maternity leave from her friend. But he did not spend a single penny towards hospital bills and medicines etc. for the baby. Another grievance of the appellant is that on 15th August 1975 their child fell seriously ill She requested the respondent to call a doctor and get some medicine. However, the respondent slipped away and did not come hack for more than two hours. Left with no other alternative she herself went to the doctor and brought some medicines, etc. . by borrowing money from her neighbour. On her way back home, she found the respondent sitting in a restaurant with his friends. She went to him and asked about the medicine for the child. However, the respondent insulted her there and told her that he was not bothered about the child or the appellant
( 4 ) YET another grievance of the appellant is that the respondent would leave the house early in the morning and come late at night sometimes at 12-30 A. M. /1-30 A. M. in drunkard condition. Whenever she objected to the same, the respondent would insult and abuse her. He would even beat her sometimes and would threaten that in case she objected in future she would be thrown out of the house. On occasions, she was beaten mercilessly even with a stick. Although she tolerated all these acts of cruelty and tried to control the respondent, but the latter was determined to create conditions for dissolving the marriage. During her five years stay with the respondent, the latter never took her for outing or for social functions. He would not sit at home even on holidays and she came to know that the respondent would even take leave from his office without informing her about it and then keep away from home. On 25th April 1977. at about 4. 30 A. M. when the appellant was asleep, the respondent brought one big utensil (Patila) from the kitchen and threw the same on her. It hit her on her back causing injuries to her body and as soon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.