SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Del) 222

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI, G.C.JAIN
INDER PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HARI SHANKER, RATTAN LAL

ROHATGI J.

( 1 ) :- These are two cross-appeals from the order of the Addl. District Judge dt. 23rd Dec. 1978.

( 2 ) PURSUANT to a notification dated Mar. 6, 1967 issued under S. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (the Act) the Union of India, respondent, acquired building No. 20, Tilak Marg, New Delhi owned by the appellant. In due course the Land Acquisition Collector made the award. He awarded compensation at Rs. 100/-per square yard for the land. For the superstructure standing on the land he awarded Rs. 62,270/ -. For trees he gave Rs. 606/ -.

( 3 ) ON reference under S. 18 of the Act the learned Addl. District Judge enhanced the compensation. For the land he awarded to the owner Rs. 150/- per square yard instead of Rs. 100/- per square yard. For superstructure he awarded Rs. 99,270/ -. This meant an increase of Rs. 37,000/- over and above what the Collector had awarded to the land owner for the superstructure. The learned Judge held that out of the compensation so awarded half will go to Capt. Mahabir Prasad Memory Trust and half will go to the appellant, Inder Persad (now dead and represented by his widow Smt. Sneh Lata Prasad ). From the order of the Addl. District Judge these t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top