SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Del) 273

High Court Of Delhi
BRIJ LAL - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 326 of 1983
Decided On : 10/15/1984

Advocates Appeared:
Bharati Anand, K.K.Sud, R.Chauhan

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 306/ 34-Abetment of suicide-Durga Devi died of self-innovation-Petitioners are her son and daughter-in. law-Allegation that petitioners were guilty of abetting suicide by ill-treatment, neglect, humiliation and suggestion that victim should die by drowning in Yamuna-Trial Conrt"s order that a charged be framed -Revision against the order-None of the allegations falls within purview of "abetment"-Only materials consisting of 2 dying declaration; controversy as to which of them more authentic; no evidence as to the course of conduct or the nature of relationship between victim and other members of the family or as to the conduct of couple after the unfortunate event; victim happily lived with the couple for 10 years-Are the petitioners guilty of abetting suicide? (No)-Even though they could not escape the moral responsibility for what has happened, their conduct or utterance do not constitute an act of abetD1ent -Result-Order for the fralDing of charge quashed. (Paras 1, 17 & 18)

       

H. L. Anand, J.

( 1 ) BRIJ Lal and Kanta Devi, a married couple, challenge in revision the order of the trial court directing that a charge be framed against them for an offence under Section 306 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, of abetment of suicide by Durga Devi, mother of Brij Lal. The victim died of self-immolation and the petitioners were sent up for trial, on the basis of two dying declarations, on the allegations that the petitioners were guilty of "abetting" suicide by "ill-treatment", "neglect", "humiliation" and even a suggestion that she should "die by drowning in Yamuna". It is an unusual case of mother-in-law having been allegedly driven to put an end to her life on account of maltreatment by the son and the daughter-in-law. It is, in a sense, a case of "reverse" maltreatment of a mother-in-law in which the son allegedly colluded or actively participated.

( 2 ) DURGA Devi was living with the couple. She was 64 years of age. On February 12, 1983, she committed suicide. The couple must have been married mure than 10 years ago because, according to one of the two declarations, the victim had been living with them for the "last 10 years". Durga Devi, who died in hospital on the morning of February 14, 1983 had made two dying declarations. She is alleged to have set fire to her clothes at about 2. 30 A. M. She was in the hospital by 4 a. m. The first declaration was made before the attending doctor and was attested by a Sub-Inspector of Police. It was recorded in Hindi. There is no mention of the time but it must have been recorded between 4 a. m. and 8. 55 a. m. on the date of the incident. This is how its free English translation runs :-

"i state that I live on the above address. My younger son Brij Lal also lives there with me. Today at about 2. 30 A. M. while lightening jyoti for Hanuman worship I set myself to fire with the match slick as I was in great trouble. My daughter-in-law Kanta Devi used to trouble one and two days before I even had a quarrel with her and I had left the home. I again came back home and in the night I told everyone in the family that I should be given Rs. 200. 00 for my expenses as I needed the same. Nobody gave me the money and my son Brij Lal asked me to leave his house. On account of being fed up I set myself to fire in the night as my daughter-in-law was not giving me milk and tea. I was in great trouble and they used to say that I should die. "the second was made again while in hospital, at 8. 55 A. M. on the same day. This was recorded by a Sub-Divisional Magistrate, who happened to be an Assamese. The S. D M. couldn t have recorded it in Hindi, and the victim was illiterate and knew no English. This declaration was. therefore, recorded in English. This is how it runs :-

"smt. Durga Devi has stated in her declaration that her daughter-in- law Smt. Kanta wife of Brij Lal her son was also calling her all sort of bad words, not giving her food and also giving all sorts of troubles, her son also used to give her bad words at the instance of her daughter-in-law Smt. Kanta told her to die by drowning in Yamuna and she was told to open the Trunk of Smt. Durga Devi and to give the money in the presence of elder son. As her daughter-in-law was not behaving properly and she could not spare anyone. She herself put the match stick on the quilt and burnt. She was living with her son Brij Lal for the last 10 years and she was being harassed by her daughter-in-law and her son for the last two years. Kanta had told many thing but I could not remember. She has got nothing to say". In the trial court, the couple sought discharge on the ground that, on the dying declarations, the only material on which thich they had been sent up for trial framing of charge was not justified as there was no material to show any abetment by way of "instigation", "illegal omission", "persuation" or "any consistent course of torture", neglect or harassment", which could be said to have driven her to take her own l























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top