SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Del) 321

RAJINDAR SACHAR, S.B.WAD
KRISHAN KUMAR MALIK – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY KAUL, Ashok Bhasin, M.L.Jain, P.R.Bhatt, R.K.Mehra

RAJINDAR SACHAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition and others were heard together and these should be disposed of by a common order as the point raised is the same.

( 2 ) THIS petition is directed against the order of Deputy Director (Allotment), Delhi Administration, informing the petitioner that his request of allotment of an alternative plot under the scheme of a large scale acquisition, development and disposal of land in Delhi, 1961 cannot be acceded to. The facts are that one Damomal was the owner of agricultural land measuring 62 bighas two biswas. The said land was the subject matter of a notification under S. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, Dt. 23rd Jan. , 1965. Section 6 notification was issued on 13-1-1969. The petitioner purchased 1/8th share in the 62 bighas 2 biswas from the Vendor Damomal by means of a registered sale deed dt. 21st May, 1973. Award with respect to the land was made on 31st Jan. 1983 and the possession of the same was taken on 4th Mar. 1983. The petitioner received compensation of his l/16th share in April, 1983.

( 3 ) THE Delhi Administration has issued a Scheme of allotment of alternative plot under the Scheme of Large Scale Acquisition and Development and Disp




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top