SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Del) 330

SULTAN SINGH
ALLIED ENGINIRS – Appellant
Versus
HARBAKSH GILL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Bhasin, M.L.SHARMA

Sultan Singh, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short the Act ) challenges the judgment and order dated 2nd April, 1984 of the Rent Control Tribunal confirming the order dated 6th March, 1984 of the Additional Rent Controller directing the tenant appellant to deposit the amount of Rs. 2362. 50 as rent for the period ending 31st December, 1982 and arrears at Rs. 2887. 50 per month from 1st January, 1983 onwards in accordance with Section- 15 (1) of the Act.

( 2 ) THE facts are that the respondent-landlady let out flat No. 13, 2nd floor, new Delhi House 27, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi to the appellant for running an office with effect from 20th March; 1976 in terms of a lease deed dated 18th March, 1976 on a monthly rent of Rs. 2625. 00. The. initial period of lease was three years. It was renewed by mutual consent of the parties as per Clause 2, Part III of the said lease deed enhancing the rent by 10 per cent of the last paid rent. The monthly rent was thus increased to Rs. 2887. 50.

( 3 ) THE respondent on 2nd August, 1983 filed a petition under Section 14 (1) (a) of the Act alleging that the appellant had neither paid nor tend










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top