SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 37

LEELA SETH
I. D. RAJPUT – Appellant
Versus
RAMJI DASS – Respondent


Leila Seth, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is by the petitioner-tenant. He challenges the order of the Rent Controller dated 4th September, 1982, evicting him from the dispute premises and submits that it is not in accordance with law. He contends that the entire approach is erroneous.

( 2 ) THE premises in dispute is the ground floor of house No. S-96, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi. The owner-landlord is the respondent, Ramji Dass. The tenant is the petitioner I. D. Rajput. He has been a tenant in the said premises since May, 1970. The premises were let out to him fohis residence and are being used for this purpose.

( 3 ) ORIGINALLY, he was inducted under a limited tenancy under section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, (to be referred to in short as "the Act"), for eleven months at a rental of Rs. 550. 00 per month. After a short while, the rent was increased to Rs. 650. 00 per month. On the expiry of eleven months, the landlord again applied for and obtained an order under section 21 of the Act for creating a limited tenancy for a further period of eleven months at a rental of Rs. 650. 00. Thereafter, permission undersection 21 of the Act was regularly sought and obtained
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top