SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 42

D.K.KAPUR, S.RANGANATHAN
GORA MAL HARI RAM – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT SOAP AND OIL INDUSTRIES – Respondent


D. K. Kapur

( 1 ) WE have heard this appeal after issuing a show cause notice to the defendants. As the subject-matter of the suit pending on the Original Side of the High Court was the issue of a permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from using the impugned trade mark savera , we thought an expeditious disposal of the appeal was necessary.

( 2 ) WE have had advantage of the judgment of the learned Single Judge refusing an interim injunction and we have also been taken through the record of the case. The plaintiffs-appellants claimed that they had been manufacturing soap using the trade mark savera since 18th March, 1976, but this was disputed by the defendants. On the other hand, it was claimed that after an extensive inquiry and investigation in the market, they found that the impugned trade mark was used by two soap manufacturers under some territorial limits-one manufacturer was Ashoka Industries, who had a registered trade mark restricted to the district of Ujjain and there was a similar registration in favour of Raja Soap Factory in Mysore. It thus came about that the defendant bona fide adopted the trade mark savera and applied for the registration of the same








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top