SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 34

LEELA SETH
LAJPAT RAI SEHGAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Leila Seth,j.

( 1 ) THE point in issue in this petition, pertains preeminentily to the interpretation of certain provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Sections 2 (d) and (r) and 470 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

( 2 ). In brief, the facts are, that petitioner No. 1, Lajpat Rai Sehgal, married Prem Kumari on 3rd March, 1980. This was in consequence of the engagement which took place on 26th January, 1980. Prem Kumari s father, Mr. Vishan Dass Khanna. asserted that a list had been given to him on 25th January, 1980 by Lajpat Rai Sehgal and Nand Kishore Chopra, his brother-in- law, petitioner No. 2. The "shagun" was given in accordance with the list. Thereafter, on 27th January, 1980, certain dowry demands were made. He gave what he possibly could at the marriage, but obviously Lajpat Rai Sehgal s family was not satified. As such, they made a fresh demand on 4th March, 1980, the day after the marriage. Thereafter, repeated demands were made through Nand Kishore Chopra and his wife Kanta Chopra, petitioner No. 3, Lajpat Rai Sehgal s sister, for a transistor radio, a fan and furniture etc.

( 3 ) ON 9th May, 1980 Prem Kumari died of burns. Her father lodged a first i






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top