SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 143

B.N.KIRPAL, PRAKASH NARAIN
BANWARI LAL RADHEY MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB STATE CORPORATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED – Respondent


( 1 ) DELHI High Court Act, S. 10 An appeal barred under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act cannot be maintained under Section 10 of the High Court Act. Arbitration Act, S. 39- Section 10 of the High Court Act docs not repeal Section 39 of the Arbitration Act. An appeal barred under Section 39 cannot be maintained under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top