SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 272

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
MADAN MOHAN BEHL – Appellant
Versus
VEENA RANI – Respondent


A. B. Rohatgi, J.

( 1 ) THE husband, Madan Mohan Behl, has brought a petition for divorce against the wife, Veena Rani. The petition is founded on one ground only. The ground is that the wife has ceased to be a Hindu. She has embraced Islam (Section 13 (l) (ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act (the Act) ). The wife is contesting the petition. She has denied her conversation to Islam as alleged by the husband.

( 2 ) DURING the pendency of the petition the wife made an application under Sections 24 and 26 of the Act for maintenance for herself and the child. There is one child of the marriage. She is a girl, Ruchi by name. She is about 10 years old. She is studying in a school. This application was opposed by the husband mainly on two grounds : (1) that the wife had convened herself to Islam, and (2) that she has remarried. One Walia who is also a convert to Islam is said to have married her. Both these grounds were denied by the wife. There was nothing to show before the learned Additional District Judge that the wife has changed her religion or that she has remarried. So he made an order on 5-4-1983 that the husband shall pay to the wife Rs. 500. 00 on account of maintenance pendente lite












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top