SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 261

S.B.WAD
KAUSHALYA SINGHA – Appellant
Versus
A. K. SINGHA – Respondent


S. B. Wad, J.

( 1 ) -THE only question raised in this appeal is whether the pendente lite maintenance should be granted from the date of the application for that purpose or from the date of the order of the Trial Court. The appellant contends that she is entitled to alimony from the date of the presentation of the application.

( 2 ) THE appellant-wife filed a petition for judicial separation against the respondent under Section 22, read with Section 23 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. On 27th/30th April, 1981 she moved an application for pendente lite maintenance. The learned Trial Judge found that the husband s income was at least Rs. 1572. 00 per month and the wife had no income of her own. The learned Judge, therefore, allowed the maintenance @ Rs. 314. 00 from the date of the order. The order was passed on 29-5-1982.

( 3 ) THE application for pendente lite maintenance was made under Section 36 of the Indian Divorce Act. The said section reads as under :

"36. Alimony pendente lite.-In any suit under this Act, whether it be instituted by a husband or a wife, and whether or not she has obtained an order of protection, the wife may present a petition fo alimony pending the suit. Suc



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top